Yang and Wong² investigated the proline-catalyzed nitro-Michael reaction, looking at four examples, two with aldehydes and two with ketones (Reactions 1-4).

These four reactions were examined atMP2/311+G**//M06-2x/6-31G**, and PCM was also applied. The key element of this study is that they examined two different types of transition states: (a) based on the Houk-List model involving a hydrogen bond and (b) an electrostatic based model with no hydrogen bond. These are sketched in Scheme 1. For each of the reactions 1-4 there are 8 located transition states differing in the orientation of the attack on to the syn or anti enamine.

Scheme 1. TS models

The two lowest energy TS are shown in Figure 1. TS1-β1-RS is the lowest TS and it leads to the major enantiomer. The second lowest TS, TS1-β3-SR, lies 2.9 kJ mol^-1 above the other TS, and it leads to the minor enantiomer. This lowest TS is of the Houk-List type (Model A) while the other TS is of the Model B type. The enthalpies of activation suggest an ee of 54%, in reasonable
agreement with experiment.

TS1-β1-RS

TS1-β1-RS

Figure 1. M06-2x/6-31G** optimized geometries of TS1-β1-RS and TS1-β1-RS.

The computations of the other three reactions are equally good in terms of agreement with experiment, and importantly the computations indicate the reversal of stereoselection between the aldehydes and the ketones. These computations clearly implicate both the Houk-List and the non-hydrogen bonding TSs in the catalyzed Michael additions.

Houk in collaboration with Scheffler and Mahrwald investigate the use of histidine as a catalyst for the asymmetricaldol reaction.³ Examples of the histidine-catalyzed aldol are shown in Reactions 5-7.

	Reaction 5
	Reaction 6
	Reaction 7

The interesting twist here is whether the imidazole can also be involved in hydrogen bonding to the acceptor carbonyl group, serving the purpose of the carboxylic acid group in the Houk-List TS when proline is the catalyst (Model A). The transition states for these and a few other reactions were computed at M06-2x/6-31+G(d,p) including with the SMD continuum solvent model for water. The two lowest energy TSs for the reaction of isobutyraldehde and formaldehyde are shown in Figure 2; TS1 has the carboxylic acid group as the hydrogen donor while the imidazole is the donor in TS2. Of note is that these two TS are isoenergetic, indicating that both modes of stabilization are at play with histidine as the catalyst.

TS1

TS2

Figure 2. M06-2x/6-31+G(d,p) geometries of the two lowest energy TSs for the reaction of isobutyraldehde and formaldehyde catalyzed by histidine.

The possible TSs for Reactions 5-7 were also located. For example, with Reaction 5, the lowest energy TS involves the imidazole as the hydrogen donor and it leads to the major product. The lowest energy TS that leads to the minor product involves the carboxylic acid as the donor. The computed ee’s for Reactions 5-7 are in very good, if not excellent, agreement with the experimental values. The study should spur further activity in which one might tune the stereoselectivity by using catalysts with multiple binding opportunities.

References

(1) List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III; "Proline-Catalyzed Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions," J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 2395-2396, DOI: 10.1021/ja994280y.

(2) Yang, H.; Wong, M. W. "(S)-Proline-catalyzed nitro-Michael reactions: towards a better understanding of the catalytic mechanism and enantioselectivity," Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2012, 10, 3229-3235, DOI: 10.1039/C2OB06993H

(3) Lam, Y.-h.; Houk, K. N.; Scheffler, U.; Mahrwald, R. "Stereoselectivities of Histidine-Catalyzed Asymmetric Aldol Additions and Contrasts with Proline Catalysis: A Quantum Mechanical Analysis," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6286-6295, DOI: 10.1021/ja2118392

Butts and Bifulco were interested in the structure of conicasterol F 1 and opted to make two sets of comparison.¹ The first uses the traditional approach of comparing the computed and experimental ¹³C chemical shifts. The second comparison uses the distances between protons, coming from the optimized structure and the rotating-frame nuclear Overhauser effect (ROE).

Standard analysis of the NMR spectra of 1 allowed for the determination of all of the stereochemistry except for the epoxy ring at C₈ and C₁₄. The possible options are shown as 1a and 1b. The optimized geometries (MPW1PW91/6-31G) of these two diastereomers are shown in Figure 1.

1a	1b
1a	1b

Figure 1. Optimized geometries of 1a and 1b.

Comparison of 15 distances between protons determined by the ROE experiment and by computation led to a mean absolute error of 7.8% for 1a and 3.0% for 1b, suggesting that the latter is the correct structure. Similar comparison was then made between the experimental chemical shifts of 12 of the carbon atoms with the computed values of the two isomers. The mean absolute error in the chemical shifts of 1a is 3.7ppm, but only 0.8 ppm for 1b. Both methods give the same conclusion: conicasterol F has structure 1b.

References

(1) Chini, M. G.; Jones, C. R.; Zampella, A.; D’Auria, M. V.; Renga, B.; Fiorucci, S.; Butts, C. P.; Bifulco, G., "Quantitative NMR-Derived Interproton Distances Combined with Quantum Mechanical Calculations of ¹³C Chemical Shifts in the Stereochemical Determination of Conicasterol F, a Nuclear Receptor Ligand from Theonella swinhoei," J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 1489-1496, DOI: 10.1021/jo2023763.

InChIs

1b: InChI=1/C29H46O4/c1-16(2)17(3)8-9-18(4)21-14-23(31)28-26(21,7)15-24-29(32-24)25(6)12-11-22(30)19(5)20(25)10-13-27(28,29)33-28/h16-18,20-24,30-31H,5,8-15H2,1-4,6-7H3/t17-,18-,20+,21-,22+,23+,24-,25+,26-,27+,28+,29+/m1/s1
InChIKey=XTWHHLLDFQALAM-XAIGNWORBC

Gas phase computations of the 5-exo-tet and 6-endo-tet ring openings of 1 were examined for both the acid and base catalyzed routes at B2PLYP/6-311++G(d,p)//B2PLYP/6-31G(d).
The results are summarized in Figure 1. Basically, as expected by Baldwin’s rules, the closure to the tetrahydrofuran (5-exo-tet) is favored under both catalyzed conditions. However, the preference is small under base conditions, with the difference in the free energy of activation of only 1.2 kcal mol^-1.

Figure 1. Gas phase energies (kcal mol^-1) for the acid an base catalyzed reactions of 1 to 2 or 3.

The enzyme Lsd19B produces just the analogue of 3. So, the two regioisomeric TSs were reoptimized with an aspartic acid group and a tyrosine group in the positions they occupy in the active site of the enzyme Lsd19b. The two resulting transition states, evaluated at B2LYP/6-311++G(d,p)//MO6-2x/6-31G(d), are shown in Figure 2. The activation energy for the 6-endo-tet reaction is 18.0 kcal mol^-1, 2.5 kcal mol^-1 lower than for the 5-exo-tet route. This energy difference would give rise to a 100:1 selectivity for the tetrahydropyran product, in accord with experiment. The enzyme preorganizes for and favors the base catalyzed path that leads to 3.

5-exo-tet TS model ΔG‡ = 20.5

6-endo-tet TS model ΔG‡ = 18.0

Figure 2. Transition state models of the active site. Activation energies in kcal mol^-1.

References

(1) Hotta, K.; Chen, X.; Paton, R. S.; Minami, A.; Li, H.; Swaminathan, K.; Mathews, I. I.; Watanabe, K.; Oikawa, H.; Houk, K. N.; Kim, C.-Y., "Enzymatic catalysis of anti-Baldwin ring closure in polyether biosynthesis," Nature, 2012, 483, 355-358, DOI: 10.1038/nature10865.

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C8H16O2/c1-6(9)4-5-8(3)7(2)10-8/h6-7,9H,4-5H2,1-3H3/t6-,7?,8+/m0/s1
InChIKey=YEAGKBPXLVGCPK-YPVSKDHRBB

2: InChI=1/C8H16O2/c1-6-4-5-8(3,10-6)7(2)9/h6-7,9H,4-5H2,1-3H3/t6-,7-,8-/m0/s1
InChIKey=RRDMOYCGUXNJSL-FXQIFTODBG

3: InChI=1/C8H16O2/c1-6-4-5-8(3,9)7(2)10-6/h6-7,9H,4-5H2,1-3H3/t6-,7-,8+/m0/s1
InChIKey=WWLWIBPPUNCAQU-BIIVOSGPBQ

The optimized geometries of trans- and cis-stilbene optimized at CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) are displayed in Figure 1. As expected, the trans conformer is planar and the cis conformer is twisted to avoid clashes between the phenyl rings. The optimized structure of the 1.1 capsule is also shown in Figure 1. All of these structures are fairly insensitive to computational method. (They have also looked at an even larger capsule, but I have omitted displaying its structure here.)

(a)	(b)
(c)	(d)

Figure 1. CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) optimized structures of (a) trans-stilbene, (b) cis-stilbene , (c) the 1.1 capsule, and (d) trans-stilbene inside the 1.1 capsule.

The structure of trans- stilbene inside the 1.1 capsule is shown in Figure 1. Of particular note is that the stilbene is no longer planar. (This twisting is perhaps better observed by an end-on view, which the reader can obtain by clicking on the picture and then manipulating the full 3-D structure using the Jmol applet.) The different computational methods give slightly different encapsulated structures, and vary a bit in their binding energies, but the twisting of the stilbene is reproduced by each method. Though not shown here, trans-stilbene in the larger capsule is again a nearly planar structure.

The structure of the S₁ state of trans-stilbene in the large capsule is the same as for free trans-stilbene. However, the geometry of the S₁ state in the smaller 1.1 capsule is twisted and corresponds to the conical intersection geometry.

The absorption spectra and the emission spectra were computed for the free and encapsulated structures. The absorption and emission spectra for free stilbene and stilbene in the larger capsule are nearly identical, corresponding to the experimental observation of similar fluorescence behavior. The absorption spectra of stilbene in the 1.1 capsule has a small blue shift of 8 nm due to the twisted geometry. But the major result is that the S₁ state of stilbene inside the 1.1 capsule distorts to the conical intersection, allowing for radiationless return to the ground state. This means that there would be no fluorescence, and that is exactly what is observed.

References

(1) Tzeli, D.; Theodorakopoulos, G.; Petsalakis, I. D.; Ajami, D.; Rebek, J., "Conformations and Fluorescence of Encapsulated Stilbene," J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 4346-4354, DOI: 10.1021/ja211164b

InChIs

trans-stilbene: InChI=1/C14H12/c1-3-7-13(8-4-1)11-12-14-9-5-2-6-10-14/h1-12H/b12-11+
InChIKey=PJANXHGTPQOBST-VAWYXSNFBV

cis-stilbene: InChI=1/C14H12/c1-3-7-13(8-4-1)11-12-14-9-5-2-6-10-14/h1-12H/b12-11-
InChIKey=PJANXHGTPQOBST-QXMHVHEDBW

The argument rests largely on a definition of of an in situ bond energy. For the VB approach, this requires choosing as a reference a non-bonding interaction between the atoms with regards to a pair of electrons. For the CI approach, the bond energy is half the energy of the singlet-triplet gap. So, for C₂, the VB/6-31G* estimate of the bond energy of the putative fourth bond is 14.3 kcal mol^-1. For the full CI/6-31G* computations of the singlet-triplet gap, the bond energy estimate is 14.8 kcal mol^-1, and using the experimental value of the gap, the estimate is 13.2 kcal mol^-1. Not a strong bond, but certainly meaningful!

In the VB approach, the fourth bond is a weighted sum of the antibonding 2σ_u and bonding 3σ_g orbitals – a combination that gives rise to small constructive overlap between the two C atoms. In the CI model, the wavefunction is dominated by the first two configurations; the first configuration, with a coefficient of C₀=0.828 has 2σ_u doubly occupied and the second coefficient, with C_D=0.324, has the 3σ_g orbital doubly occupied. Considering that 3σ_g is a bonding orbital, the significant contribution of this configuration gives rise to the fourth bond.

References

(1) Shaik, S.; Danovich, D.; Wu, W.; Su, P.; Rzepa, H. S.; Hiberty, P. C., "Quadruple bonding in C2 and analogous eight-valence electron species," Nat. Chem., 2012, 4, 195-200, DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1263.

InChIs

C₂: InChI=1/C2/c1-2
InChIKey=LBVWYGNGGJURHQ-UHFFFAOYAE

1

2

Figure 1. B3LYP/6-31G(d) optimized geometries of 1 and the racemization transition state 2.

Itami also notes that 1 is chiral and computed the barrier for racemization of 19.9 kcal mol^-1¸ through the transition state 2, also shown in Figure 1. This racemization process is compared with the racemization of 1,1’-binaphthyl.

References

(1) Yagi, A.; Segawa, Y.; Itami, K., "Synthesis and Properties of [9]Cyclo-1,4-naphthylene: A π-Extended Carbon Nanoring," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2962-2965, DOI: 10.1021/ja300001g

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C90H54/c1-2-20-56-55(19-1)73-37-38-74(56)76-41-42-78(60-24-6-5-23-59(60)76)80-45-46-82(64-28-10-9-27-63(64)80)84-49-50-86(68-32-14-13-31-67(68)84)88-53-54-90(72-36-18-17-35-71(72)88)89-52-51-87(69-33-15-16-34-70(69)89)85-48-47-83(65-29-11-12-30-66(65)85)81-44-43-79(61-25-7-8-26-2(61)81)77-40-39-75(73)57-21-3-4-22-58(57)77/h1-54H/b75-73-,76-74-,79-77-,80-78-,83-81-,84-82-,87-85-,88-86-,90-89-
InChIKey=WUFIQFYLEOBLMY-YNQZQJAJBX

All of the possible ethynyl-substituted cyclobutadiene species (1-7) were optimized at B3LYP/6-31G(d) and CCSD/cc-pVDZ in their singlet and triplet states.

The structures of singlet and triplet 7 are shown in Figure 1. The geometries provided by the two different methods are quite similar. They show a rectangular form for the singlets and a delocalized, nearly square ring for the triplets.

7singlet

7triplet

Figure 1. CCSD/cc-pVDZ optimized structures of singlet and triplet 7.

The computed singlet-triplet gap decreases with each ethynyl substituent. B3LYP, which overestimates the stability of triplets, predicts that 6 and 7 will be ground state triplets, while CCSD predicts a singlet ground state for all 7 species, with the gap decreasing steadily from 11.5 to 8.2 kcal mol^-1, a value that is also probably underestimated.

This change in the singlet-triplet gap reflects a stronger stabilizing effect of each ethynyl group to the cycnobutadiene ring for the triplet than for the singlet state. This is seen in the homodesmotic stabilization energies.

Lastly, NICS(1)_zz values are positive for all of the singlets and negative for the triplets. The positive values for the singlets reflect their antiaromatic character, also seen in the alternant bond distances around the ring. The NICS values of the singlets decrease with increasing substitution. The negative NICS values of the triplets reflects aromatic character, as seen in the non-alternant distances around the ring. Interestingly, the triplet NICS values decrease with increasing ethynyl substitution, suggesting decreased aromaticity, even though the homodesmotic reactions suggest increasing stabilization with substitution.

References

(1) Esselman, B. J.; McMahon, R. J., "Effects of Ethynyl Substitution on Cyclobutadiene," J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 483-490, DOI: 10.1021/jp206478q

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C4H4/c1-2-4-3-1/h1-4H
InChIKey=HWEQKSVYKBUIIK-UHFFFAOYAI

2: InChI=1/C6H4/c1-2-6-4-3-5-6/h1,3-5H
InChIKey=XFHXCHFBSJDBGT-UHFFFAOYAG

3: InChI=1/C8H4/c1-3-7-5-6-8(7)4-2/h1-2,5-6H
InChIKey=YSSBCMLQKUIAEP-UHFFFAOYAI

4: InChI=1/C8H4/c1-3-7-5-8(4-2)6-7/h1-2,5-6H
InChIKey=IRAQOGPKMAXTQY-UHFFFAOYAN

5: InChI=1/C8H4/c1-3-7-5-6-8(7)4-2/h1-2,5-6H
InChIKey=YSSBCMLQKUIAEP-UHFFFAOYAI

6: InChI=1/C10H4/c1-4-8-7-9(5-2)10(8)6-3/h1-3,7H
InChIKey=BVCIPPXDFXWTJR-UHFFFAOYAQ

7: InChI=1/C12H4/c1-5-9-10(6-2)12(8-4)11(9)7-3/h1-4H
InChIKey=HEUYILYXFVQGOW-UHFFFAOYAO

(R)-1: R = OH, R’ = H
(S)-1: R = H, R’ = OH

Isosclerone is the dextrorotatory isomer, while regiolone is the levorotatory isomer. The question though is which one is R and which one is S? Evidente and co-workers arbitrarily decided to compute the spectral properties of the S isomer.¹ They located four low energy conformers at B3LYP/6-31G* and B3LYP/TZVP. (These conformers are not shown here as the authors did not deposit the coordinates. Reviewers and editors – please insist that this computational data be mandatory for publication!) The conformer relative energies, listed in Table 1, are dependent on the method, however, the two lowest energy structures will dominate the population and both will be present to a significant extent, regardless of which energy set is used. The optical rotation [α]_D was computed at B3LYP/6-31G*//B3LYP/TZVP, and these too are listed in Table 1. The Boltzmann-weighted [α]_D is 21.8. Even though the lowest energy conformer contributes a negative rotation, the much larger positive rotation due to the second-lowest energy conformer, along with the two other conformers, will dominate to dictate the OR value. This suggests that the enantiomers are (S)(+)-1 and (R)(-)-1. Computed ECD spectra confirm this assignment; the computed ECD of the (S) isomer is a near mirror image of the experimental ECD of the (-)-1 compound. Therefore, regiolone is (R)(-)-1 and isosclerone is (S)(+)-1.

Table 1. Relative free energies (kcal mol^-1) and [α]_D of the conformers of (S)-1.^a

^aAll computations performed with B3LYP. ^bAt B3LYP/6-31G*//B3LYP/TZVP

References

(1) Evidente, A.; Superchi, S.; Cimmino, A.; Mazzeo, G.; Mugnai, L.; Rubiales, D.; Andolfi, A.; Villegas-Fernández, A. M., "Regiolone and Isosclerone, Two Enantiomeric Phytotoxic Naphthalenone Pentaketides: Computational Assignment of Absolute Configuration and Its Relationship with Phytotoxic Activity," Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2011, 5564-5570, DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201100941

InChIs

Regiolone: InChI=1/C10H10O3/c11-7-4-5-9(13)10-6(7)2-1-3-8(10)12/h1-3,7,11-12H,4-5H2/t7-/m1/s1
InChIKey=ZXYYTDCENDYKBR-SSDOTTSWBB

Isosclerone: InChI=1/C10H10O3/c11-7-4-5-9(13)10-6(7)2-1-3-8(10)12/h1-3,7,11-12H,4-5H2/t7-/m0/s1
InChIKey=ZXYYTDCENDYKBR-ZETCQYMHBD

The first interesting item is that B3LYP/6-31+G** fails to predict the proper structure of the transition state. It predicts an asymmetric structure 2, shown in Figure 1, while MPW1k/6-31+G**, M06, and MP2 predict a C_s transition structure 3. The C_s TS is confirmed by a grid search of M06-2x geometries with CCSD(T)/6-311++G88/PCM(CH₂Cl₂) energies.

2

3

Figure 1. Optimized TSs 2 (B3LYP/6-31+G**) and 3 (MPW1K/6-31+G**).

The PES using proper computational methods is bifurcating past TS 3, falling downhill to product 1 or 1’. Lying on the C_s plane is a second transition state that interconverts 1 and 1’. On such a surface, conventional transition state theory would predict equal amounts of 1 and 1’, i.e. no isotope effect! So they must resort to a trajectory study – which would be impossibly long if not for the trick of making the labeled carbon super-heavy – like ²⁸C,⁴⁴C, ⁷⁶C and ¹⁴⁰C and then extrapolating back to just ordinary ¹³C. These trajectories indicate a ratio of 1’:1 of 0.990 in excellent agreement with the experimental value of 0.993.

Interestingly, most trajectories recross the TS, usually by reaching into the region near the second TS. However, the recrossing decreases with increasing isotopic mass, and this leads to the isotope effect. It turns out the vibrational mode 3 breaks the C_s symmetry; movement in one direction along mode 3 has no mass dependence but in the opposite direction, increased mass leads to decreased recrossing – or put in another way, in this direction, increased mass leads more often to product.

But one can understand this reaction from a statistical point of view as well. If one looks at the free energy surface, there is a variational TS near 3, but then there is a second set of variational transition states (one leading to 1 and one to 1’) which are associated with the formation of the second C-C bond. In a sense there is an intermediate past 3 that leads to two entropic barriers, one on a path to 1 and one on the path to 1’. RRKM using this model gives a ratio of 0.992 – again in agreement with experiment! It is as Singleton notes “perplexing”; how do you reconcile the statistical view with the dynamical (trajectory) view? Singleton has no full explanation.

Lastly, they point out that a similar situation occurs in the organocatalyzed Diels-Alder reaction of MacMillan shown below.² (This reaction is also discussed in a previous post.) Now Singleton finds that the “substituent effects, selectivity, solvent effects, isotope effects and activation parameters” are all dictated by a second variational TS far removed from the conventional electronic TS.

References

(1) Gonzalez-James, O. M.; Kwan, E. E.; Singleton, D. A., "Entropic Intermediates and Hidden Rate-Limiting Steps in Seemingly Concerted Cycloadditions. Observation, Prediction, and Origin of an Isotope Effect on Recrossing," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1914-1917, DOI: 10.1021/ja208779k

(2) Ahrendt, K. A.; Borths, C. J.; MacMillan, D. W. C., "New Strategies for Organic Catalysis: The First Highly Enantioselective Organocatalytic Diels-Alder Reaction," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4243-4244, DOI: 10.1021/ja000092s.

InChIs

2-butene: InChI=1/C4H8/c1-3-4-2/h3-4H,1-2H3/b4-3-
InChIKey=IAQRGUVFOMOMEM-ARJAWSKDBO

Dichloroketene: InChI=1/C2Cl2O/c3-2(4)1-5
InChIKey=TVWWMKZMZALOFP-UHFFFAOYAY

1 (no isotope): InChI=1/C6H8Cl2O/c1-3-4(2)6(7,8)5(3)9/h3-4H,1-2H3/t3-,4+/m0/s1
InChIKey=BAEYWHUXGUIZSP-IUYQGCFVBH

Low energy gas-phase conformers of both epimers of 1 and 2 were optimized at B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p). (These computations were done by the Tantillo group.) See Figure 1 for the optimized lowest energy conformers. Using these geometries the NMR chemical shifts were computed at mPW1PW91/6-311+G(d,p) with implicit solvent (chloroform). The chemical shifts were Boltzmann-weighted and scaled according to the prescription (see this post) of Jain, Bally and Rablen.² The computed chemical shifts were then compared against the experimental NMR spectra. For both 1 and 2, the ¹³C NMR shifts could not readily distinguish the two epimers. However, the computed ¹H chemical shifts for the S epimer of each compound was significantly in better agreement with the experimental values; the mean average deviation for the S epimer of 2 is 0.08 ppm but 0.36ppm for the R epimer. As a check of these results, DP4 analysis³ (see this post) of 2 indicated a 100% probability for the S epimer using only the proton chemical shifts or with the combination of proton and carbon data.

1

2

Figure 1. B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) optimized geometries of the
lowest energy conformations of 1 and 2.

References

(1) Quasdorf, K. W.; Huters, A. D.; Lodewyk, M. W.; Tantillo, D. J.; Garg, N. K., "Total Synthesis of Oxidized Welwitindolinones and (-)-N-Methylwelwitindolinone C Isonitrile," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 134, 1396-1399, DOI: 10.1021/ja210837b

(2) Jain, R.; Bally, T.; Rablen, P. R., "Calculating Accurate Proton Chemical Shifts of Organic Molecules with Density Functional Methods and Modest Basis Sets," J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4017-4023, DOI: 10.1021/jo900482q.

(3) Smith, S. G.; Goodman, J. M., "Assigning Stereochemistry to Single Diastereoisomers by GIAO NMR Calculation: The DP4 Probability," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12946-12959, DOI: 10.1021/ja105035r

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C22H21ClN2O3S/c1-6-20(4)15(23)10-13-17(26)21(20,24-11-29)12-8-7-9-14-16(12)22(28,19(13,2)3)18(27)25(14)5/h6-10,13,28H,1H2,2-5H3/t13-,20+,21+,22-/m0/s1
InChIKey=VDNAFECSPBXWIH-WOHBTAIZBQ

2: InChI=1/C22H21ClN2O3/c1-7-20(4)15(23)11-13-17(26)21(20,24-5)12-9-8-10-14-16(12)22(28,19(13,2)3)18(27)25(14)6/h7-11,13,28H,1H2,2-4,6H3/t13-,20+,21+,22-/m0/s1
InChIKey=GFNPBZSGZFQTJA-WOHBTAIZBX