Archive for the 'carbenes' Category

Predicting reactive C-C bonds

Can one identify a labile bond in a molecule without computing activation barriers? Markopoulos and Grunenberg suggest that examination of the bond length and its associated relaxed force constant might provide some guidance.1

The relaxed force constant comes from identifying the force constant for some coordinate while allowing for other coordinates to relax. Badger’s rule relates the (normal) force constant to bond distance (k = a/(reqd)3). For a series of 36 molecules, covering 71 C-C single bonds, Badger’s rule fits the data well, except for a set of molecules which undergo rapid Cope rearrangements (like bullvalene and semibullvalene). For these molecules, the relaxed force constants are much lower than Badger’s rule predicts, and indicates a weakened bond. This gives rise to their low activation barriers.

Another example is provided with the highly strained polycyclic hydrocarbon 1. This compound is predicted (B3LYP/6-31G(d)) to undergo a [1,2]-shift to give the carbene 2 (see Figure 1), and this is extremely exothermic: -105.7 kcal mol-1, reflecting the enormous strain of 1. The barrier, through TS1 (Figure 1), is only 6.7 kcal mol-1. This rearrangement was predicted by examining the relaxed force constants which identified a very weak bond, despite a short bond distance of 1.404 Å. It is unlikely that without this guidance, one would have predicted that this short bond is likely to rupture and produce this particular product.

1

2

TS1

Figure 1. B3LYP/6-31G(d) optimized structures of 1, 2, and TS1.

References

(1) Markopoulos, G.; Grunenberg, J. "Predicting Kinetically Unstable C-C Bonds from the Ground-State Properties of a Molecule," Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 10648-10651, DOI: 10.1002/anie.20130382.

InChIs

1: InChI=1S/C14H12/c1-2-8-11-5-3-9-7(1)10(9)4-6-12(8,11)14(8,11)13(7,9)10/h1-6H2
InChIKey=LNBZAENQMFDBJW-UHFFFAOYSA-N

2: InChI=1S/C14H12/c1-3-11-12-4-2-9-7-8(1,9)10(9)5-6-13(11,12)14(10,11)12/h1-6H2
InChIKey=UKVODHRLGFPZPT-UHFFFAOYSA-N

carbenes Steven Bachrach 25 Nov 2013 3 Comments

Unusual carbene ground states

The singlet and triplet carbene is the topic of Chapter 4, especially sections 1 and 2. The ground state of methylene is the triplet, with one electron in the σ-orbital and one electron in the π-orbital, with the spins aligned. The lowest singlet state places the pair of electrons in the σ-orbital, and this state is about 9 kcal mol-1 higher in energy than the triplet. The next lowest singlet state has one electron in each of the σ- and π-orbitals, with the spins aligned. The singlet state with both electrons in the π-orbital is the highest of these four states, some 60 kcal mol-1 above the ground state triplet.

Hoffmann and Borden now pose the question “Can the doubly occupied π carbene (1A10π2) be the ground state with appropriate substitution?” The answer they find is yes!1

The trick is to find a combination of substituents that will raise the energy of the σ-orbital and lower the energy of the π-orbital. The latter effect can be enhanced if the π-orbital can be a part of an aromatic (6e-) ring.

Two of the best possibilities for identifying a ground state 1A10π2 carbene are 1 and 2. The CASSCF/6-31G(d) optimized geometries of these two are shown in Figure 1. In 1, the nitrogen lone pairs act to destabilize the σ-orbital, while the aldehyde group acts as a withdrawing group to stabilize the π-orbital. The result is that the 1A10π6 state of 1 is predicted to be about 8 kcal mol-1 more stable than the triplet state, as per CASPT2 and CCSD(T) computations.


1


2

An ever greater effect is predicted for 2. Here the nitrogen lone pairs adjacent to the carbene act to destabilize the σ-orbital. The empty π-orbital on B lowers the energy of the carbene π-orbital by making it part of the 6-electron aromatic ring. The 1A10π6 state of 2 is predicted to be about 25 kcal mol-1 more stable than its triplet state!

1

2

Figure 1. CASSCF/6-31G(d) optimized geometries of the 1A10π6 states of 1 and 2.

References

(1) Chen, B.; Rogachev, A. Y.; Hrovat, D. A.; Hoffmann, R.; Borden, W. T. "How to
Make the σ0π2 Singlet the Ground State of Carbenes," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 13954-13964, DOI: 10.1021/ja407116e.

InChIs

1: InChI=1S/C5H2N2O2/c8-1-4-5(2-9)7-3-6-4/h1-2H
InChIKey=QDSVROXEBBWIOO-UHFFFAOYSA-N

2: InChI=1S/C3H3BN2/c1-4-2-6-3-5-1/h1-2,4H
InChIKey=MQJXDZBYOSOLST-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Borden &carbenes Steven Bachrach 14 Oct 2013 4 Comments

Singlet-triplet carbene gap and remote subtituents

Can a remote substituent affect the singlet-triplet spin state of a carbene? Somewhat surprisingly, the answer is yes. Sheridan has synthesized and characterized the meta and para methoxy-substituted phenyltrifluoromethyl)carbenes 1 and 2.1 The UV-Vis spectrum of 1 is consistent with a triplet as its EPR and reactivity with oxygen. However, the para isomer 2 gave no EPR signal and failed to react with oxygen or hydrogen, suggestive of a singlet.

The conformations of 1 and 2 were optimized at B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) and the lowest energy
singlet and triplet conformers are shown in Figure 1. The experimental spectral features of 1 match up best with the computed features of the triplet, and the same is true for the singlet of 2.

1singlet

1triplet

2singlet

2triplet

Figure 1. B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) optimized geometries of 1 and 2.

The triplet of 1 is estimated to be about 4 kcal mol-1 below that of the singlet – larger than the general overestimation of the stability of triplets that beleaguer B3LYP. For 2, B3LYP predicts a singlet ground state.

The isodesmic reactions 1 and 2 help understand the strong substituent effect. For 1, the meta substituent destabilizes both the singlet and triplet by a small amount. For 2, the para methoxy group stabilizes the triplet slightly, but stabilizes the singlet by a large amount. This stabilization is likely the result of the contribution of a second resonance structure 2b. A large rotational barrier for both the methyl methyl and the trifluoromethyl groups supports the participation of 2b.


ΔEsinglet = -0.8 kcal mol-1
ΔEtriplet = -0.6 kcal mol-1

Rxn 1


ΔEsinglet = -5.8 kcal mol-1
ΔEtriplet = -1.1 kcal mol-1

Rxn 2

References

(1) Song, M.-G.; Sheridan, R. S., "Regiochemical Substituent Switching of Spin States in
Aryl(trifluoromethyl)carbenes," J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19688-19690, DOI: 10.1021/ja209613u

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C9H7F3O/c1-13-8-4-2-3-7(5-8)6-9(10,11)12/h2-5H,1H3
InChIKey=CAHMVAJXXQQHDW-UHFFFAOYAA

2: InChI=1/C9H7F3O/c1-13-8-4-2-7(3-5-8)6-9(10,11)12/h2-5H,1H3
InChIKey<=VMKIJVYGODJYPU-UHFFFAOYAF

carbenes Steven Bachrach 14 Feb 2012 4 Comments

Phenylhydroxycarbene

Somehow I missed this paper when it came out a few months ago, even though I was aware it was coming – as I mentioned it in one of my previous posts!

Anyways, Schreiner and Allen reported on their third study of hydroxyl carbenes (see these posts on dihydroxymethylene and hydroxymethylene), this time examining phenylhydroxycarbene.1 As I covered in my book, there is a lot of work on phenylcarbenes which typically ring expand to the cycloheptatetraene, see Reaction 1. One might expect phenylhydroxycarbene to do the same thing, i.e. 1 converting into 2 (Reaction 2). 1 is prepared by high-vacuum flash pyrolysis of phenylglyoxylic acid 3 and then capturing the product in an argon matrix at 11 K (Reaction 3).

Reaction 1

Reaction 2

Reaction 3

The carbene 1 is identified through comparison of its experimental and computed (anharmonic frequencies at CCSD(T)/cc-pVDZ) IR frequencies.

No ring expansion is observed at all – Reaction 2 does not occur. Instead, 1 rearranges to benzaldehyde 4 (Reaction 4) at 11 K with a half life of 2.46 h (and a half life of 2.55 h at 20 K). The deuterated analogue does not convert to benzaldehyde and 1-d appears to be completely stable.

Reaction 4

So, what is going on? The cis and trans forms of 1 interconvert through a barrier of 22.7 kcal mol-1. The trans isomer can convert to benzaldehyde (the reaction is very exothermic: -50.8 kcal mol-1) with a barrier of 28.8 kcal mol-1 through TS1, shown in Figure 1. The cis isomer can cleave into benzene and CO (not observed) with a huge barrier of 55 kcal mol-1. All of these barrier were computed at CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ.

TS1

Figure 1. MP2/cc-pVDZ optimized transition state for the conversion of 1 into 4.

Benzaldehyde seems to be produced by passing through a huge barrier, something that is impossible from a thermal perspective (we’re at 11 K!). But this can be accomplished by tunneling. Tunneling probabilities were computed from the MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ intrinsic reaction path with barrier penetration integrals computed with the WKB approximation. The bottom line: the computed half-life is 3.3 h and the deuterated species is computed to have a half-life of 8700 years(!), both in excellent agreement with experimental observation. Quantum mechanical tunneling is clearly the explanation for this chemistry.

This is another fine example of the power of joint experimental/computational studies. And be on the look-out for an even more exciting case from this group. I met with Wes Allen on my recent trip to the University of Georgia and was entertained with another hydroxycarbene that undergoes quite novel tunneling!

References

(1) Gerbig, D.; Reisenauer, H. P.; Wu, C.-H.; Ley, D.; Allen, W. D.; Schreiner, P. R., "Phenylhydroxycarbene," J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7273-7275, DOI: 10.1021/ja9107885

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C7H6O/c8-6-7-4-2-1-3-5-7/h1-5,8H
InChIKey=QVZIGMRPQWIGCV-UHFFFAOYAE

2: InChI=1/C7H6O/c8-7-5-3-1-2-4-6-7/h1-6H
InChIKey=QVWDCTQRORVHHT-UHFFFAOYAM

3: InChI=1/C8H6O3/c9-7(8(10)11)6-4-2-1-3-5-6/h1-5H,(H,10,11)/f/h10H
InChIKey=FAQJJMHZNSSFSM-KZFATGLACS

4: InChI=1/C7H6O/c8-6-7-4-2-1-3-5-7/h1-6H
InChIKey=HUMNYLRZRPPJDN-UHFFFAOYAE

carbenes &Schreiner &Tunneling Steven Bachrach 21 Sep 2010 3 Comments

The C-S triple bond

Does the Carbon-Sulfur triple bond exist? There’s probably little doubt it does in the CS molecule. But now Schreiner and Mloston have offered up the H-C≡S-OH species as a possibility.1 Obtained by flash photolysis of 1, giving 2, and upon irradiation at 254 nm, H-C≡S-OH 3 is the observed species and not the expected carbene HO-C-SH 4. 3 is confirmed by excellent agreement between the observed and computationally predicted IR spectra.

The CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ structures of 3 and 4 are shown in Figure 1. It is interesting that the carbene is not observed, even though it is 26.6 kcal mol-1 more stable than 3.

3

4

Figure 1. CCSD(T)/cc-PVTZ optimized structures of 3 and 4.1

So is there a triple bond? The short C-S distance (1.547 Å) is very similar to that in CS (1.545 Å). NBO analysis indicates a triple bond. But the MOs indicate significant lone pair build-up on both C and S, consistent with the strongly non-linear angles about these two atoms. The authors conclude that 3 is a “structure with a rather strong CS double bond or a weak triple bond”.

References

(1) Schreiner, P. R.; Reisenauer, H. P.; Romanski, J.; Mloston, G., "A Formal Carbon-Sulfur Triple Bond: H-C≡S-O-H," Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 8133-8136, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200903969

carbenes &Schreiner Steven Bachrach 30 Nov 2009 3 Comments

Carbene insertions

A computational study of addition of singlet carbenes to bicyclobutanes reveals another potential energy surface where dynamics may be active. Rablen, Jones and co-workers examined the reaction of dichlorocarbene with bicyclobutane 1 and 1,2,2-trimethylbicyclobutane 2 (Reactions 1 and 2) using a number of computational techniques.1

Reaction 1

Reaction 2

For reaction 1, they identified three reaction pathways. The first two involve the carbene approaching along the central C-C bond. Path A (Scheme 1) involves a single transition state that leads to product 3, with a barrier of 8.4 kcal mol-1. The second pat (pathway B), leads to critical point 4, which is a transition state at HF/6-31G* and QCISD/6-31G* but is a local minimum at CCSD/6-31G*. This minimum however is very shallow, and vibrational energy will exceed the barriers about it. Both pathways indicate an asynchronous but concerted reaction. The last pathway (C) is for insertion of the carbine into the bridgehead C-C bond, leading to the bicyclo product 5. This barrier is very high, 27 kcal mol-1, and so this path is unlikely to be competitive.

Path A

Path B

Path c

Experimental study of Reaction 2 showed that only 6 is produced.2 Rablen and Jones identified six pathways where the carbene attacks 2 along the bridgehead bond (analogous to Paths A and B, except there are three rotamers and the attack can be at either bridgehead carbon) and the insertion path that leads to 8. Once again, this last pathway has a very large barrier and is non-competitive. Attack at the unsubstituted bridgehead carbons is favored over attack at the methyl-substituted bridgehead by 2-3 kcal mol-1. The path that leads directly to 7 has a slightly lower barrier (0.4 kcal mol-1) than the path that leads directly to 8. The analog of Path B leads here to a true intermediate 9 through a barrier 0.4 kcal mol-1 higher than the barrier that leads to 7. This intermediate is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. CCSD/6-31G* structure of intermediate 9.1

The energies of the barriers suggest that 7 will be the major product, but not the exclusive product. Rablen and Jones point out that intermediate 9 lies in a very shallow plateau and exit from this intermediate can lead to either 7 or 8. This sort of potential energy surface has been implicated in reactions that exhibit non-statistical behavior indicative of dynamic effects (see Chapter 7 of my book). Rablen and Jones speculate that dynamics might be dictating the product distribution in Reaction 2 as well. Confirmation awaits a molecular dynamics study.

References

(1) Rablen, P. R.; Paiz, A. A.; Thuronyi, B. W.; Jones, M., "Computational Investigation of the Mechanism of Addition of Singlet Carbenes to Bicyclobutanes," J. Org. Chem. 2009, DOI: 10.1021/jo900485z

(2) Jackson, J. E.; Mock, G. B.; Tetef, M. L.; Zheng, G.-x.; Jones, M., "Reactions of carbenes with bicyclobutanes and quadricyclane : Cycloadditions with two σ bonds," Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 1453-1464, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96386-0.

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C4H6/c1-3-2-4(1)3/h3-4H,1-2H2
InChIKey=LASLVGACQUUOEB-UHFFFAOYAV

2: InChI=1/C7H12/c1-6(2)5-4-7(5,6)3/h5H,4H2,1-3H3
InChIKey=GJMVYBBYZUWWLJ-UHFFFAOYAI

3: InChI=1/C5H6Cl2/c1-2-3-4-5(6)7/h2,4H,1,3H2
InChIKey=FGUOQAVVVDPABB-UHFFFAOYAR

5: InChI=1/C5H6Cl2/c6-5(7)3-1-4(5)2-3/h3-4H,1-2H2
InChIKey=SUZACPSWEYRCBD-UHFFFAOYAW

6: InChI=1/C8H12Cl2/c1-6(2)8(3,4)5-7(9)10/h5H,1H2,2-4H3
InChIKey=QIFFCMZJZYIIBA-UHFFFAOYAZ

7: InChI=1/C8H12Cl2/c1-6(2)7(3)4-5-8(9)10/h5H,4H2,1-3H3
InChIKey=MOELQSRRCNAPQV-UHFFFAOYAX

8: InChI=1/C8H12Cl2/c1-6(2)5-4-7(6,3)8(5,9)10/h5H,4H2,1-3H3
InChIKey=PRCOWYZGJRWGOB-UHFFFAOYAP

carbenes &Dynamics Steven Bachrach 11 Jun 2009 No Comments

Dihydroxycarbene

Following on the great study of hydroxycarbene1 (see my blog post), Schreiner now reports on the synthesis and characterization of dihydroxycarbene 1.2 It is prepared by high-vacuum flash pyrolysis of oxalic acid (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Dihydroxycarbene can exist in three different conformations characterized by the relationship about the C-O bond, either s-cis or s-trans. The three conformations are shown in Figure 1, and the s-trans,s-trans structure is the local energy minimum (computed at CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ).

1tt (0.0)

1ct (0.1)

1cc (6.7)

Figure 1. CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ optimized geometries and relative energies (kcal mol-1) of the conformers of 1.2

Identification of the 1 is made through comparison of the experimental and computed IR vibrational frequencies. As an example, the experimental and computed frequencies for the s-trans,s-trans conformer are listed in Table 1. The agreement is excellent.

Table 1. Computed and experimental vibrational frequencies (cm-1) and intensities (in parentheses) of the s-trans,s-trans conformation of 1.2


vibration

computed

experiment

1

3876.4 (23.5)

3633.2 / 3628.6 (w)

2

3871.4 (234.1)

3625.1 (s)

3

1443.1 (124.4)

1386.2 (m)

4

1370.5 (58.3)

1289.0 / 1287.4 (w)

5

1157.8 (470.6)

1110.3 / 1109.3 (vs)

6

1156.6 (1.4)

 

7

742.4 (178.8)

706.6 (s)

8

672.4 (0.0)

 

9

641.6 (11.2)

 


Unlike hydroxycarbene, dihydroxycarbene is stable. The amazing instability of hydroxycarbene is due to tunneling through a large barrier: nearly 30 kcal mol-1.1 The tunneling route for the decomposition of 1 is more difficult for two reasons. First, its C-O bond is quite strong; the C-O distance is quite short, 1.325 Å. This makes a long distance that must be traversed in the tunneling mode. (The strong bond is due to π-donation from the oxygen lone pair into the empty carbon p orbital; this is noted by the large rotational barrier about the C-O bonds of 17 kcal mol-1!) Second, the activation barrier for decomposition is very high, at least 34 kcal mol-1.

References

(1) Schreiner, P. R.; Reisenauer, H. P.; Pickard Iv, F. C.; Simmonett, A. C.; Allen, W. D.; Matyus, E.; Csaszar, A. G., "Capture of hydroxymethylene and its fast disappearance through tunnelling," Nature, 2008, 453, 906-909, DOI: 10.1038/nature07010.

(2) Schreiner, P. R.; Reisenauer, H. P., "Spectroscopic Identification of Dihydroxycarbene13," Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7071-7074, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200802105

InChIs

1: InChI=1/CH2O2/c2-1-3/h2-3H

carbenes &Schreiner &Tunneling Steven Bachrach 06 Oct 2008 2 Comments

An update on Hydroxymethylene

A nice summary of the tunneling behavior of hydroxymethylene1 was just published by Bucher in Angewandte Chemie.2 Bucher strongly points out that the really novel part of this work is the very large barrier through which the proton tunnels. My blog post on this topic is here.

References

(1) Schreiner, P. R.; Reisenauer, H. P.; Pickard IV, F. C.; Simmonett, A. C.; Allen, W.
D.; Matyus, E.; Csaszar, A. G., "Capture of hydroxymethylene and its fast disappearance through tunnelling," Nature, 2008, 453, 906-909, DOI: 10.1038/nature07010.

(2) Bucher, G.; “Hydroxycarbene: Watching a Molecular Mole at Work,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 6957 – 6958, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200803195

carbenes &Schreiner &Tunneling Steven Bachrach 28 Aug 2008 No Comments

Hydroxymethylene tunnels through a large barrier

The very simple carbene hydroxymethylene, HOCH, has finally been prepared and characterized.1 Glyoxylic acid CHOCO2H is subjected to high-vacuum laser photolysis. It fragments into HOCH, which is then trapped into an argon matrix. The experimental IR frequencies match up very well with the CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ harmonic frequencies of the trans isomer 1t that are also adjusted for anharmonic effects. The computed vertical excitation energy of 415 nm matches well with the experimental value of the maximum absorption in the UV/vis spectra of 427 nm.

The other very interesting experimental result is that HOCH has a lifetime of about 2 hours in the matrix, while the deuterated species DOCH is stable. To explain these results, Schreiner, Allen and co-workers optimized a number of structures on the PES at CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ and computed their energies using the focal point technique. The optimized structures and their relative energies are given in Figure 1.

1t (0.0)

TS2 (29.7)

2 (-52.1)

TS1(26.8)

 

 

1c (4.4)

 

 

Figure 1. Optimized CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ structures of HOCH isomers and their Focal Point relative energies (kcal mol-1).1

The barriers for rearrangement from 1t are both very high. Rearrangement to formaldehyde 2 requires crossing a barrier of 29.7 kcal mol-1, while the barrier to convert to the cis isomer 1c is 26.8 kcal mol-1. (Note that from 1c a cleavage into CO and H2 can occur, but this barrier is another 47.0 kcal mol-1.) These barriers are too large to be crossed at the very low temperatures of the matrices. However, using the intrinsic reaction potential at CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ and WKB theory, the tunneling lifetime of HOCH is computed to be 122 minutes, in excellent accord with the experiment. The lifetime for DOCH is computed to be over 1200 years. Thus, the degradation of hydroxymethylene is entirely due to tunneling through a very large classical barrier! This rapid tunneling casts serious doubt on the ability to ever identify any hydroxymethylene in interstellar space.

References

(1) Schreiner, P. R.; Reisenauer, H. P.; Pickard IV, F. C.; Simmonett, A. C.; Allen, W.
D.; Matyus, E.; Csaszar, A. G., "Capture of hydroxymethylene and its fast disappearance through tunnelling," Nature, 2008, 453, 906-909, DOI: 10.1038/nature07010.

InChI

1: InChI=1/CH2O/c1-2/h1-2H
2: InChI=1/CH2O/c1-2/h1H2

carbenes &focal point &Schreiner &Tunneling Steven Bachrach 19 Aug 2008 3 Comments

Arylcarbenes

In the book I extensively discuss the singlet-triplet gap of methylene and some of the chemistry of phenylcarbene. Schleyer and Schaefer have now reported computations on the singlet-triplet gap of arylcarbenes.1 The geometries of phenylcarbene 1, diphenylcarbene 2, 1-naphthylcarbene 3, bis(1-naphtyl)carbene 4, and 9-anthrylcarbene 5 were optimized at B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p). These geometries are shown in Figure 1.

1s

1t

2s

2t

3s

3t

4s

4s

4s

4s

Figure 1. B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) optimized structures of singlet and triplet 1-5.

Since this functional is known to underestimate the singlet-triplet gap of carbenes, they employ an empirical correction based on the difference in this gap for methylene between the computed value (11.89 kcal mol-1) and the experimental value (9.05 kcal mol-1). These corrected energy gaps are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Corrected singlet-triplet energy gaps (kcal mol-1) at B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p).

Molecule

ΔEST

1

2.75

2

2.94

3

3.40

4

3.74

5

5.67

Using the following isodesmic reactions, they estimate the stabilization of the singlet or triplet carbene afforded by the aryl substituent:

R-C-H + CH4 → H-C-H + R-CH3

R-C-R + CH4 → R-C-H + R-CH3

These isodesmic energies are listed in Table 2. For phenylcarbne, the phenyl group stabilizes the singlet more than the triple, reducing the ST gap by 6.3 kcal mol-1. However, adding a second phenyl group (making 2) stabilizes both the singlet and triplet by about the same amount, leading to little change in the ST gap. The singlet does not get accrue the potential benefit of the second aryl group because sterics prohibit the two rings from being coplanar.

Table 2. Aryl effect for 1-5 based on the isodesmic reaction energies (kcal mol-1)


Molecule

ΔEsinglet

ΔEtriplet

1

24.4

18.1

2

15.8

16.0

3

26.6

20.9

4

18.6

19.0

5

30.5

26.8


References

(1) Woodcock, H. L.; Moran, D.; Brooks, B. R.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Schaefer, H. F., "Carbene Stabilization by Aryl Substituents. Is Bigger Better?," J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 3763-3770, DOI: 10.1021/ja068899t.

InChIs

1: InChI=1/C7H6/c1-7-5-3-2-4-6-7/h1-6H

2: InChI=1/C13H10/c1-3-7-12(8-4-1)11-13-9-5-2-6-10-13/h1-10H

3: InChI=1/C11H8/c1-9-5-4-7-10-6-2-3-8-11(9)10/h1-8H

4: InChI=1/C21H14/c1-2-8-19-14-16(12-13-17(19)6-1)15-20-10-5-9-18-7-3-4-11-21(18)20/h1-14H

5: InChI=1/C15H10/c1-11-14-8-4-2-6-12(14)10-13-7-3-5-9-15(11)13/h1-10H

carbenes &Schaefer &Schleyer Steven Bachrach 17 Dec 2007 No Comments